Should Art be Judged or Measured?

Valuing the arts in a non-judgmental and instrumentalist age

LIPPfest 2011 event

Date: Saturday 24 September, 12 noon (for a 12:15 start) to 2pm.

Venue: The Millennium Room, The Carriageworks, Leeds

Speakers: Tiffany JenkinsDavid O’BrienJavier Stanziola and Paul Taylor

A donation of £3 will be asked for on the day.

 

At a time of scarce resources the arts sector finds itself obliged to make a better and better case for public funding. Under pressure from policymakers, and unsure about aesthetic judgment, arts organisations are increasingly justifying what they do in terms of socio-economic impact rather than artistic quality. Economic and statistical methods — such as Social Return on Investment, and surveys asking the general public to place a monetary value on arts exhibitions and events — are used to measure the value of the arts.

Some in the arts sector accuse the government of philistinism and point out it is difficult, if not impossible, to quantify the value of art objects and performances in terms of monetary or social benefits. For them, culture should be judged, not measured, however difficult and controversial the attempt to find public agreement on the quality of artistic products.

Policymakers retort that aesthetic judgment is elitist in that it relies on experts in ‘high art’ who impose their personal preferences on the wider public. Measuring the socio-economic value of the arts relies instead on more objective and democratic criteria. The arts sector, they maintain, would be better off if it understood the need for government to allocate public funds following a democratic, transparent and impartial process.

Should we judge or measure the arts? Is it possible to reach public agreement on the quality of artistic production through aesthetic judgment or does it necessarily mean imposing the values of a cultural elite on to the wider public? Is it possible or desirable to measure the socio-economic impact of the arts? Is this a more democratic, transparent and objective process?

 

Readings:

Culture: It’s not the economy stupid!, Tiffany Jenkins, Spiked-online, 5 July 2011

It isn’t philistine to judge art economically, Dave, O’Brien, Spiked-online, 13 July 2011

 


Current Sponsors

Jordans Solicitors are a West Yorkshire law firm with a 70 year record of excellent service. They are the highly acclaimed choice for the Yorkshire area and beyond in both business and individual legal matters: jordanssolicitors.co.uk


Leeds Salon on Facebook

Follow theleedssalon on Twitter


Sign up to our mailing list


Partners

FIPA is The Leeds Salon's sister journal

The Leeds Salon is a Debating Matters judging partner

The Leeds Salon is a judging partner of the sixth form Debating Matters competition

The Tetley and The Leeds Salon are partners in school debate for central and south Leeds


Amazon

Leeds Salon is a member of the Amazon Affiliate Programme. When you follow this link, we receive a small percentage of anything you spend in that visit. It costs you no extra but is a big help to us!



Leeds Debate Links

Café Everythinque

Café Psychologique

Café Scientifique (Chapel Allerton)

Café Scientifique (Headingley)

Headingley Festival of Ideas

Headingley LitFest

Leeds Phil & Lit Society

Leeds Skeptics in the Pub

Taking Soundings

Talking Allowed In Leeds: PiPs

 

National Debate Links

Birmingham Salon

Brighton Salon

East Midlands Salon

Liverpool Salon

London Legal Salon

Manchester Salon

Sheffield Salon

Debating Matters

Institute of Ideas

Manifesto Club

The Great Debate

WORLDwrite

 


Global Debate Links

Berlin Salon

Dublin Salon

Zurich Salon



Donations gratefully received